https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355054 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and granting eligibility of items used in repair and maintenance of capital goods for CENVAT credit under Rule 2(k) of CCR, 2004. Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of repair and maintenance activities in the manufacturing process, aligning with precedents that inputs used for such purposes are eligible for credit. The impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellant in accordance with the law. en-us Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355054 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and granting eligibility of items used in repair and maintenance of capital goods for CENVAT credit under Rule 2(k) of CCR, 2004. Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of repair and maintenance activities in the manufacturing process, aligning with precedents that inputs used for such purposes are eligible for credit. The impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellant in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355054