https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355048 The Tribunal declined to interfere with the order refusing penalty under the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and recovery through the B-17 bond because the impugned order had already been upheld by the jurisdictional High Court and the Supreme Court. In view of those binding judicial pronouncements, the Department's appeal was rejected and the adjudicating authority's order was maintained. en-us Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 07:45:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355048 The Tribunal declined to interfere with the order refusing penalty under the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and recovery through the B-17 bond because the impugned order had already been upheld by the jurisdictional High Court and the Supreme Court. In view of those binding judicial pronouncements, the Department's appeal was rejected and the adjudicating authority's order was maintained. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355048