<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 462 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355041</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the matter to the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision, considering all evidence presented. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the admissibility of cenvat credit, rejection of the appeal by the authorized signatory, and the distribution of credit between different units were found to have merit, leading to the previous orders being set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 07:44:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 462 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355041</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the matter to the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision, considering all evidence presented. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the admissibility of cenvat credit, rejection of the appeal by the authorized signatory, and the distribution of credit between different units were found to have merit, leading to the previous orders being set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>