https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355040 The Tribunal upheld the confirmed duty demands for clandestine removal, interest, and penalties against the appellants. The loose slips found during the search provided sufficient evidence of clandestine activities, justifying the demands. The Tribunal ruled that no further investigation into the buyers was necessary. However, the interest demand was deemed unsustainable due to duty payment on the same date as the shortage. The penalties imposed were reviewed, resulting in reductions for the main appellant and director due to excessive comparison with the duty amount. Consequently, the appeals were disposed of based on these findings. en-us Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 07:44:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355040 The Tribunal upheld the confirmed duty demands for clandestine removal, interest, and penalties against the appellants. The loose slips found during the search provided sufficient evidence of clandestine activities, justifying the demands. The Tribunal ruled that no further investigation into the buyers was necessary. However, the interest demand was deemed unsustainable due to duty payment on the same date as the shortage. The penalties imposed were reviewed, resulting in reductions for the main appellant and director due to excessive comparison with the duty amount. Consequently, the appeals were disposed of based on these findings. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355040