<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 460 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355039</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) as time-barred under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to a delay of 237 days in filing the appeals beyond the prescribed period. Despite arguments by the appellants regarding lack of communication, strong merits, and the respondent&#039;s non-contestation, the delay was not condoned as the reasons provided were deemed insufficient. The dismissal was upheld, emphasizing the importance of complying with the statutory timelines for filing appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 07:44:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 460 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355039</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) as time-barred under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to a delay of 237 days in filing the appeals beyond the prescribed period. Despite arguments by the appellants regarding lack of communication, strong merits, and the respondent&#039;s non-contestation, the delay was not condoned as the reasons provided were deemed insufficient. The dismissal was upheld, emphasizing the importance of complying with the statutory timelines for filing appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>