<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 456 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355035</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the inclusion of Pre-Delivery Inspection (PDI) charges in the assessable value of Fenoplast PVC colliery conveyor belting. The Tribunal found that the PDI charges, conducted by a third party at the buyer&#039;s behest and expense, should not be included in the assessable value. Citing previous decisions and noting the department&#039;s lack of appeal against the order dropping the demand, the Tribunal held the demand as unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 07:44:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 456 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355035</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the inclusion of Pre-Delivery Inspection (PDI) charges in the assessable value of Fenoplast PVC colliery conveyor belting. The Tribunal found that the PDI charges, conducted by a third party at the buyer&#039;s behest and expense, should not be included in the assessable value. Citing previous decisions and noting the department&#039;s lack of appeal against the order dropping the demand, the Tribunal held the demand as unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>