<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1626 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198782</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the re-computation of transfer pricing adjustments related to various international transactions. It upheld the aggregation approach for benchmarking and instructed the TPO to re-calculate adjustments using the TNMM method with external comparables. The Tribunal also addressed issues such as inappropriate comparisons of profitability, allocation of expenses, and PLI calculation, guiding the TPO to make corrections accordingly. Additionally, proposed disallowances of certain expenses were either allowed or restricted, and penalty proceedings were deemed premature and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 19:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1626 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198782</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the re-computation of transfer pricing adjustments related to various international transactions. It upheld the aggregation approach for benchmarking and instructed the TPO to re-calculate adjustments using the TNMM method with external comparables. The Tribunal also addressed issues such as inappropriate comparisons of profitability, allocation of expenses, and PLI calculation, guiding the TPO to make corrections accordingly. Additionally, proposed disallowances of certain expenses were either allowed or restricted, and penalty proceedings were deemed premature and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>