<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1348 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198787</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Company Petition under IBC 2016 was not maintainable due to a prior winding-up order by the High Court and ongoing recovery actions by financial creditors. The Tribunal emphasized that the petitioner&#039;s approach was contradictory and that the IBC could not be misused to interfere with existing legal proceedings. As a result, the Company Petition was dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 21:19:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1348 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198787</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Company Petition under IBC 2016 was not maintainable due to a prior winding-up order by the High Court and ongoing recovery actions by financial creditors. The Tribunal emphasized that the petitioner&#039;s approach was contradictory and that the IBC could not be misused to interfere with existing legal proceedings. As a result, the Company Petition was dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>