https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198762 A later arrangement intended to supersede an earlier distribution agreement did not take effect because the agreed payment was not made. The parties then acted on the basis of the original contract, and correspondence showed that both sides accepted that position. On those facts, the earlier agreement was treated as subsisting, so its arbitration clause remained available. Applying Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, the court found no reason to interfere with the direction to file the arbitration agreement and proceed to reference. en-us Wed, 13 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Feb 2018 14:55:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198762 A later arrangement intended to supersede an earlier distribution agreement did not take effect because the agreed payment was not made. The parties then acted on the basis of the original contract, and correspondence showed that both sides accepted that position. On those facts, the earlier agreement was treated as subsisting, so its arbitration clause remained available. Applying Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, the court found no reason to interfere with the direction to file the arbitration agreement and proceed to reference. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 13 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198762