<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1942 (11) TMI 10 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198760</link>
    <description>Where the trial court record had been destroyed and no copies were available, the appellate court held that the appeal could not be properly examined because the statutory duty to consider the record was mandatory. In the absence of the record, there was no effective basis to test the convictions on appeal, and no practical course remained for a fair disposal of the matter. The convictions were therefore set aside and the case was ordered to be retried.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 1942 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 14:31:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1942 (11) TMI 10 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198760</link>
      <description>Where the trial court record had been destroyed and no copies were available, the appellate court held that the appeal could not be properly examined because the statutory duty to consider the record was mandatory. In the absence of the record, there was no effective basis to test the convictions on appeal, and no practical course remained for a fair disposal of the matter. The convictions were therefore set aside and the case was ordered to be retried.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 1942 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>