<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 959 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198757</link>
    <description>A broadly worded arbitration clause covering the amount payable under an insurance policy can extend to the objection of full and final settlement, and the tribunal may decide whether a discharge voucher was signed voluntarily; on the evidence, the voucher was held involuntary and the jurisdictional challenge failed. Contract terms were read with contemporaneous correspondence and the parties&#039; conduct, so monthly declarations could govern location-wise sub-limits within the overall cover; the survey report was relevant but not conclusive, and no fresh survey was warranted. The rate of interest was found excessive and reduced to 9% per annum, while the award was otherwise sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 13:18:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 959 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198757</link>
      <description>A broadly worded arbitration clause covering the amount payable under an insurance policy can extend to the objection of full and final settlement, and the tribunal may decide whether a discharge voucher was signed voluntarily; on the evidence, the voucher was held involuntary and the jurisdictional challenge failed. Contract terms were read with contemporaneous correspondence and the parties&#039; conduct, so monthly declarations could govern location-wise sub-limits within the overall cover; the survey report was relevant but not conclusive, and no fresh survey was warranted. The rate of interest was found excessive and reduced to 9% per annum, while the award was otherwise sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>