https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11800 Chapter XX-C pre-emptive purchase orders were subject to a requirement of reasonable opportunity of hearing as read into the scheme in C.B. Gautam, but completed transactions were not to be disturbed where the property had already been sold, possession had been dealt with, and compensation had been accepted without protest. On those facts, the absence of a prior hearing did not justify reopening the pre-emptive purchase order or remanding the matter. The challenge to the order therefore failed, leaving the completed auction sale undisturbed. en-us Tue, 05 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11800 Chapter XX-C pre-emptive purchase orders were subject to a requirement of reasonable opportunity of hearing as read into the scheme in C.B. Gautam, but completed transactions were not to be disturbed where the property had already been sold, possession had been dealt with, and compensation had been accepted without protest. On those facts, the absence of a prior hearing did not justify reopening the pre-emptive purchase order or remanding the matter. The challenge to the order therefore failed, leaving the completed auction sale undisturbed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 05 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11800