<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 431 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355010</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowances under Sections 14A and 40A(3) and the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. However, it remanded the issue of disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) to the Assessing Officer for verification of new evidence. As a result, the appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 431 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355010</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowances under Sections 14A and 40A(3) and the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. However, it remanded the issue of disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) to the Assessing Officer for verification of new evidence. As a result, the appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>