<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 429 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355008</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to allow the deduction under Section 80IB as claimed by the assessee and permitting the actual expenditure under Section 35(2AA) while disallowing the weighted deduction due to procedural non-compliance. The decision emphasized the importance of direct nexus in the allocation of expenses and adherence to procedural requirements for claiming deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 07:49:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 429 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355008</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to allow the deduction under Section 80IB as claimed by the assessee and permitting the actual expenditure under Section 35(2AA) while disallowing the weighted deduction due to procedural non-compliance. The decision emphasized the importance of direct nexus in the allocation of expenses and adherence to procedural requirements for claiming deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>