<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 411 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354990</link>
    <description>A discharge voucher, no-claim certificate, or full and final settlement bars arbitration where it is voluntarily executed and the record shows accord and satisfaction. A party alleging fraud, coercion, undue influence, or duress must first produce prima facie material; a bald or belated assertion is insufficient. On the facts, the final bill was accepted in full and final settlement, the completion certificate followed, and the later attempt to reopen the claim lacked supporting particulars or evidence of economic compulsion. The settlement was therefore binding, no arbitrable dispute survived, and appointment of an arbitrator was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 411 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354990</link>
      <description>A discharge voucher, no-claim certificate, or full and final settlement bars arbitration where it is voluntarily executed and the record shows accord and satisfaction. A party alleging fraud, coercion, undue influence, or duress must first produce prima facie material; a bald or belated assertion is insufficient. On the facts, the final bill was accepted in full and final settlement, the completion certificate followed, and the later attempt to reopen the claim lacked supporting particulars or evidence of economic compulsion. The settlement was therefore binding, no arbitrable dispute survived, and appointment of an arbitrator was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>