https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354988 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Notice for recovery of Service Tax under Section 87 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Garnishee order freezing the petitioner's bank account was deemed valid, as Section 87 procedures for recovery were followed without the need for prior notice. The Court upheld the legality of the Garnishee proceedings, as the Service Tax liability had not been set aside or stayed by any higher authority. Therefore, the Court ruled in favor of the Central Government for the recovery of Service Tax dues from the petitioner, dismissing the petition without costs. en-us Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2018 17:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354988 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Notice for recovery of Service Tax under Section 87 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Garnishee order freezing the petitioner's bank account was deemed valid, as Section 87 procedures for recovery were followed without the need for prior notice. The Court upheld the legality of the Garnishee proceedings, as the Service Tax liability had not been set aside or stayed by any higher authority. Therefore, the Court ruled in favor of the Central Government for the recovery of Service Tax dues from the petitioner, dismissing the petition without costs. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354988