<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 407 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354986</link>
    <description>The cost of rewinding a stator used to complete compressor repair was treated as part of the consideration for the taxable repair service and therefore includible in the service value. The exclusion of that cost was found to be a clear valuation lapse, not a bona fide dispute, and was treated as indicative of intent to evade tax. On that basis, extended limitation and penalty were justified. The order confirming tax liability and penalty was sustained, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 407 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354986</link>
      <description>The cost of rewinding a stator used to complete compressor repair was treated as part of the consideration for the taxable repair service and therefore includible in the service value. The exclusion of that cost was found to be a clear valuation lapse, not a bona fide dispute, and was treated as indicative of intent to evade tax. On that basis, extended limitation and penalty were justified. The order confirming tax liability and penalty was sustained, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>