<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 402 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354981</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI upheld the demand for service tax and interest on carriage fees and installation charges by the appellants but set aside the penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77 &amp;amp; 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal acknowledged confusion over tax applicability, leading to the modification of the order. The appeal was partly allowed with consequential relief granted to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 402 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354981</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI upheld the demand for service tax and interest on carriage fees and installation charges by the appellants but set aside the penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77 &amp;amp; 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal acknowledged confusion over tax applicability, leading to the modification of the order. The appeal was partly allowed with consequential relief granted to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>