<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 392 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354971</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the initial decision that denied cenvat credit to the appellant due to incomplete dealer declarations on invoices. The judgment emphasized that the appellant&#039;s legitimate claim for cenvat credit should not be rejected solely based on incomplete declarations when the receipt and utilization of goods were confirmed. The Tribunal found the denial of credit unwarranted, considering the actual receipt and usage of goods by the appellant, and ruled in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 392 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354971</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the initial decision that denied cenvat credit to the appellant due to incomplete dealer declarations on invoices. The judgment emphasized that the appellant&#039;s legitimate claim for cenvat credit should not be rejected solely based on incomplete declarations when the receipt and utilization of goods were confirmed. The Tribunal found the denial of credit unwarranted, considering the actual receipt and usage of goods by the appellant, and ruled in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>