https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198739 The Tribunal upheld the order allowing the Respondent's appeal for deemed Cenvat credit under Rule 9A of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed as the Respondent complied with the necessary declaration requirements under Rule 9(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal clarified that no specific documents were required for deemed credit under Rule 9A(2), and the Respondent's method of availing credit did not violate the rule. Therefore, the Respondent was entitled to the entire credit for stock as of 31-3-2003, and the Revenue's appeal was rejected. en-us Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Feb 2018 07:44:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198739 The Tribunal upheld the order allowing the Respondent's appeal for deemed Cenvat credit under Rule 9A of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed as the Respondent complied with the necessary declaration requirements under Rule 9(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal clarified that no specific documents were required for deemed credit under Rule 9A(2), and the Respondent's method of availing credit did not violate the rule. Therefore, the Respondent was entitled to the entire credit for stock as of 31-3-2003, and the Revenue's appeal was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198739