https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198725 The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to exemption from payment of cost recovery charges from March 2010 onwards as they had met benchmark performance criteria. The Tribunal emphasized that without a calculated demand from the Revenue and prescribed rates for payment, the appellant could not be held responsible for non-payment. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was not liable for the charges, with the appeal allowed and consequential relief granted. en-us Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Feb 2018 07:42:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198725 The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to exemption from payment of cost recovery charges from March 2010 onwards as they had met benchmark performance criteria. The Tribunal emphasized that without a calculated demand from the Revenue and prescribed rates for payment, the appellant could not be held responsible for non-payment. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was not liable for the charges, with the appeal allowed and consequential relief granted. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198725