https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198713 An ex-director's prosecution was quashed because the record showed he had resigned long before the company was wound up and had intimated the Registrar of Companies. The court treated the reported receipt of the resignation notice, the absence of any rejection of the resignation, and the lack of subsequent prosecution for company defaults as sufficient to show he was not liable for the alleged offences. Non-furnishing of Form No. 32 was held immaterial on these facts, and the applicant was discharged. en-us Thu, 08 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Feb 2018 17:28:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198713 An ex-director's prosecution was quashed because the record showed he had resigned long before the company was wound up and had intimated the Registrar of Companies. The court treated the reported receipt of the resignation notice, the absence of any rejection of the resignation, and the lack of subsequent prosecution for company defaults as sufficient to show he was not liable for the alleged offences. Non-furnishing of Form No. 32 was held immaterial on these facts, and the applicant was discharged. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 08 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198713