https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198706 The appeal was dismissed, and the interim injunction was denied. The court emphasized that both trade marks are registered and have been used without interruption since 2003, ruling out the possibility of confusion due to the manner in which the drugs are administered and the commonality of the chemical composition. The complaint regarding the product insert was also dismissed as the Respondents had changed its contents. No order as to costs was made. en-us Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Feb 2018 16:49:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198706 The appeal was dismissed, and the interim injunction was denied. The court emphasized that both trade marks are registered and have been used without interruption since 2003, ruling out the possibility of confusion due to the manner in which the drugs are administered and the commonality of the chemical composition. The complaint regarding the product insert was also dismissed as the Respondents had changed its contents. No order as to costs was made. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198706