https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198699 The court concluded that the sureties could not be held liable in the absence of the principal borrower. It was held that the suit was not bad for non-joinder of other legal representatives of the deceased surety. The dismissal of the suit against the principal borrower did not discharge the sureties' liability. The appellate court's denial of costs was upheld, with each party bearing their own costs. The judgment of the appellate court was set aside, confirming the trial court's decree. en-us Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Feb 2018 16:13:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198699 The court concluded that the sureties could not be held liable in the absence of the principal borrower. It was held that the suit was not bad for non-joinder of other legal representatives of the deceased surety. The dismissal of the suit against the principal borrower did not discharge the sureties' liability. The appellate court's denial of costs was upheld, with each party bearing their own costs. The judgment of the appellate court was set aside, confirming the trial court's decree. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198699