https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198698 The court held that the liability of the surety is discharged when the principal debtor's liability is discharged due to the abatement of the suit. The executing court's decision that the decree against the surety is not executable was upheld, as the surety's liability is co-extensive with that of the principal debtor. The court found that the creditor's omission resulted in the discharge of the debt against the principal debtor, leading to the discharge of the surety's liability as well. The revision petition was dismissed, affirming that the decree against the surety is not enforceable. en-us Thu, 13 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Feb 2018 16:07:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198698 The court held that the liability of the surety is discharged when the principal debtor's liability is discharged due to the abatement of the suit. The executing court's decision that the decree against the surety is not executable was upheld, as the surety's liability is co-extensive with that of the principal debtor. The court found that the creditor's omission resulted in the discharge of the debt against the principal debtor, leading to the discharge of the surety's liability as well. The revision petition was dismissed, affirming that the decree against the surety is not enforceable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198698