https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198690 Open, continuous possession to the knowledge of the true owners, supported by consistent revenue entries, was treated as adverse once the occupants asserted their own right and excluded the respondents from possession and usufruct. Even if the original entry was permissive, it could mature into adverse possession after the change in character of possession. As the respondents did not enforce their rights within 12 years from the point when possession became adverse, the plea of limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963, was satisfied and title by prescription was established. en-us Wed, 15 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Feb 2018 14:49:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198690 Open, continuous possession to the knowledge of the true owners, supported by consistent revenue entries, was treated as adverse once the occupants asserted their own right and excluded the respondents from possession and usufruct. Even if the original entry was permissive, it could mature into adverse possession after the change in character of possession. As the respondents did not enforce their rights within 12 years from the point when possession became adverse, the plea of limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963, was satisfied and title by prescription was established. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198690