https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198688 Section 66 of the Code of Civil Procedure bars a suit challenging title derived from a court-certified purchase on the footing that the purchase was benami for the plaintiff or someone through whom the plaintiff claims, and that protection extends to transferees deriving title through the certified purchaser; the exception for third persons proceeding against property for satisfaction of a claim does not apply to transferees. A plea of adverse possession must be specifically pleaded with the date and commencement of hostile possession clearly stated, and mere long possession or an assertion of absolute title is insufficient. On both grounds, the challenge to title failed. en-us Fri, 14 Feb 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Feb 2018 14:37:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198688 Section 66 of the Code of Civil Procedure bars a suit challenging title derived from a court-certified purchase on the footing that the purchase was benami for the plaintiff or someone through whom the plaintiff claims, and that protection extends to transferees deriving title through the certified purchaser; the exception for third persons proceeding against property for satisfaction of a claim does not apply to transferees. A plea of adverse possession must be specifically pleaded with the date and commencement of hostile possession clearly stated, and mere long possession or an assertion of absolute title is insufficient. On both grounds, the challenge to title failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Feb 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198688