<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 689 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198679</link>
    <description>Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act applies where a transferor makes a fraudulent or erroneous representation of authority to transfer immovable property and the transferee acts on it for consideration, so long as the transfer contract is competent and subsisting. A transfer pendente lite under Section 52 is not void; it remains subject to the result of the suit. On the stated facts, the transaction was not void or otherwise unlawful, the challenge based on Section 41 did not defeat the transferee&#039;s claim, and a party claiming through an unproved will could not rely on a plea available only to the original transferor. The transferee was entitled to Section 43 protection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:55:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 689 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198679</link>
      <description>Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act applies where a transferor makes a fraudulent or erroneous representation of authority to transfer immovable property and the transferee acts on it for consideration, so long as the transfer contract is competent and subsisting. A transfer pendente lite under Section 52 is not void; it remains subject to the result of the suit. On the stated facts, the transaction was not void or otherwise unlawful, the challenge based on Section 41 did not defeat the transferee&#039;s claim, and a party claiming through an unproved will could not rely on a plea available only to the original transferor. The transferee was entitled to Section 43 protection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>