<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>EPCG benefits on In-house manufacture Capital Items</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=113385</link>
    <description>Manufacturer queried EPCG coverage for in house capital goods used in testing exported transformers, eligibility of imported and indigenous inputs under EPCG, and whether export obligation should be measured by value of imports or cost of equipment. The reply states imported inputs/raw materials may be brought in against authorization without payment of duties, without further detail on export obligation calculation or indigenous input treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 11:22:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>EPCG benefits on In-house manufacture Capital Items</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=113385</link>
      <description>Manufacturer queried EPCG coverage for in house capital goods used in testing exported transformers, eligibility of imported and indigenous inputs under EPCG, and whether export obligation should be measured by value of imports or cost of equipment. The reply states imported inputs/raw materials may be brought in against authorization without payment of duties, without further detail on export obligation calculation or indigenous input treatment.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 11:22:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=113385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>