<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 18 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11778</link>
    <description>The court upheld the order treating the declaration as non est and denied the petitioner the benefit under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme for the assessment year 1989-90. The court found that since all tax arrears were paid by December 1990, making no arrears outstanding on the date of declaration, the petitioner was ineligible for the KVSS benefit. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition, ruling in favor of respondent No. 1.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 18 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11778</link>
      <description>The court upheld the order treating the declaration as non est and denied the petitioner the benefit under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme for the assessment year 1989-90. The court found that since all tax arrears were paid by December 1990, making no arrears outstanding on the date of declaration, the petitioner was ineligible for the KVSS benefit. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition, ruling in favor of respondent No. 1.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>