https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354946 Additional documents supporting a consistent defence were held admissible because they were relevant to the appellants' claim that the fly ash was sourced from multiple locations and not wholly bogus. Their receipt was considered necessary for fair adjudication of eligibility to exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration after giving due opportunity to the appellants. The impugned order was set aside, with consequential relief following from the remand. en-us Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Feb 2018 08:23:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354946 Additional documents supporting a consistent defence were held admissible because they were relevant to the appellants' claim that the fly ash was sourced from multiple locations and not wholly bogus. Their receipt was considered necessary for fair adjudication of eligibility to exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration after giving due opportunity to the appellants. The impugned order was set aside, with consequential relief following from the remand. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354946