https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354938 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the valuation of job-worked goods and the time-bar issue for demanding differential duty. While the demand for the duty was found to be justified on merit, the Tribunal set aside the order in favor of the appellant due to the time-bar, emphasizing the significance of adhering to the period of limitation in such matters. en-us Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354938 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the valuation of job-worked goods and the time-bar issue for demanding differential duty. While the demand for the duty was found to be justified on merit, the Tribunal set aside the order in favor of the appellant due to the time-bar, emphasizing the significance of adhering to the period of limitation in such matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354938