<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 344 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354923</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed in its entirety. The tribunal upheld the CIT-(A)&#039;s decisions on disallowing both the amounts of Rs. 5,60,835/- and Rs. 67,62,806/- from Legal and Professional Expenses. The tribunal found the disallowances to be capital in nature and not allowable as business expenses. The decision was based on the lack of evidence regarding the business purpose of the expenses and was supported by relevant judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 08:21:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 344 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354923</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed in its entirety. The tribunal upheld the CIT-(A)&#039;s decisions on disallowing both the amounts of Rs. 5,60,835/- and Rs. 67,62,806/- from Legal and Professional Expenses. The tribunal found the disallowances to be capital in nature and not allowable as business expenses. The decision was based on the lack of evidence regarding the business purpose of the expenses and was supported by relevant judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>