<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 342 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354921</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the correct allocation of administrative expenses for share trading activity and the inapplicability of the Explanation to Section 73 due to the net profit shown by the assessee. The decision highlighted the necessity of reasonable allocation of expenses and proper computation of profit/loss in activities deemed speculative under the Income Tax Act, ultimately setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order on the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 08:21:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 342 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354921</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the correct allocation of administrative expenses for share trading activity and the inapplicability of the Explanation to Section 73 due to the net profit shown by the assessee. The decision highlighted the necessity of reasonable allocation of expenses and proper computation of profit/loss in activities deemed speculative under the Income Tax Act, ultimately setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order on the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>