<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 340 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354919</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A) order in favor of the assessee in a case concerning the deduction claimed under section 80-IA for the assessment year 2012-13. The ITAT emphasized the assessee&#039;s right to choose the initial assessment year for claiming benefits under section 80-IA, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision underscored the significance of adhering to statutory provisions and upheld the CIT(A) order based on the interpretation of section 80-IA and the High Court judgment&#039;s applicability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 08:21:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 340 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354919</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A) order in favor of the assessee in a case concerning the deduction claimed under section 80-IA for the assessment year 2012-13. The ITAT emphasized the assessee&#039;s right to choose the initial assessment year for claiming benefits under section 80-IA, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision underscored the significance of adhering to statutory provisions and upheld the CIT(A) order based on the interpretation of section 80-IA and the High Court judgment&#039;s applicability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>