https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354906 The Tribunal partially confirmed the demand of service tax on Renting of Immovable Property, holding the appellant liable for the normal period but setting aside the invocation of the extended period of limitation. The appellant's challenge against the denial of input service credit and short payment of service tax for specific periods was partly successful, with penalties being disputed. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on the application of the extended period of limitation, considering judicial precedents and the confusion surrounding the service tax levy on Renting of Immovable Property. en-us Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Feb 2018 08:20:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354906 The Tribunal partially confirmed the demand of service tax on Renting of Immovable Property, holding the appellant liable for the normal period but setting aside the invocation of the extended period of limitation. The appellant's challenge against the denial of input service credit and short payment of service tax for specific periods was partly successful, with penalties being disputed. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on the application of the extended period of limitation, considering judicial precedents and the confusion surrounding the service tax levy on Renting of Immovable Property. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354906