<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 317 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354896</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s. APL Logistics India (Pvt) Ltd., determining that the services provided did not fall under Business Auxiliary Services and therefore were not subject to service tax. The decision was based on the absence of evidence demonstrating remittance to the foreign client, leading to the overturning of the tax liability imposed by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 317 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354896</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s. APL Logistics India (Pvt) Ltd., determining that the services provided did not fall under Business Auxiliary Services and therefore were not subject to service tax. The decision was based on the absence of evidence demonstrating remittance to the foreign client, leading to the overturning of the tax liability imposed by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>