<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 312 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354891</link>
    <description>A notice proposing cancellation of registration on the premise that the business was a proprietorship could not be sustained where Form D, filed during the original dealer&#039;s lifetime, and the department&#039;s own records showed the petitioner and family members as partners. Admissions in the counter-affidavit and prior directions to restore partnership status reinforced that position. The court held that the pendency of civil disputes between private parties did not prevent the department from correcting its registration records on the materials already before it. The impugned notice was quashed, the business was treated as a partnership concern, and the registration records were directed to be restored accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 07:37:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 312 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354891</link>
      <description>A notice proposing cancellation of registration on the premise that the business was a proprietorship could not be sustained where Form D, filed during the original dealer&#039;s lifetime, and the department&#039;s own records showed the petitioner and family members as partners. Admissions in the counter-affidavit and prior directions to restore partnership status reinforced that position. The court held that the pendency of civil disputes between private parties did not prevent the department from correcting its registration records on the materials already before it. The impugned notice was quashed, the business was treated as a partnership concern, and the registration records were directed to be restored accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>