https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198654 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and permitting recredit of duty paid through Cenvat credit. The appellant, who paid duty twice, once through Cenvat credit and later in cash, was entitled to recredit the amount. The judgment emphasized compliance with excise duty payment timelines, proper utilization of Cenvat credit, and the right to recredit amounts paid in cash after initial Cenvat credit usage. en-us Mon, 23 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Feb 2018 07:22:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198654 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and permitting recredit of duty paid through Cenvat credit. The appellant, who paid duty twice, once through Cenvat credit and later in cash, was entitled to recredit the amount. The judgment emphasized compliance with excise duty payment timelines, proper utilization of Cenvat credit, and the right to recredit amounts paid in cash after initial Cenvat credit usage. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198654