<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1294 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198660</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal against the inclusion of trade discounts in the assessable value of welding electrodes. The Tribunal found that the discounts were normal trade discounts, not solely for advertisement charges, as the distributor was not obligated to advertise the products. Emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between different types of discounts, the Tribunal upheld the decision, highlighting the need for clear communication and documentation to prevent disputes over customs duty valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 07:22:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1294 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198660</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal against the inclusion of trade discounts in the assessable value of welding electrodes. The Tribunal found that the discounts were normal trade discounts, not solely for advertisement charges, as the distributor was not obligated to advertise the products. Emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between different types of discounts, the Tribunal upheld the decision, highlighting the need for clear communication and documentation to prevent disputes over customs duty valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>