https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198663 The High Court dismissed Revenue's appeals challenging the Tribunal's order reducing penalties for confiscation of goods, citing no substantial question of law. The Court rejected claims of appellants' involvement in smuggling currency due to lack of supporting evidence in the Tribunal's order. Despite appellants' absence and request for adjournment, the Court refused, emphasizing the need to prevent misleading conduct. Upholding the Tribunal's findings, the Court affirmed the confiscation of goods and reduced penalty, dismissing the appeals based on factual evidence presented. en-us Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Feb 2018 07:22:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198663 The High Court dismissed Revenue's appeals challenging the Tribunal's order reducing penalties for confiscation of goods, citing no substantial question of law. The Court rejected claims of appellants' involvement in smuggling currency due to lack of supporting evidence in the Tribunal's order. Despite appellants' absence and request for adjournment, the Court refused, emphasizing the need to prevent misleading conduct. Upholding the Tribunal's findings, the Court affirmed the confiscation of goods and reduced penalty, dismissing the appeals based on factual evidence presented. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198663