<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1716 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198644</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2003-04, 2006-07, and 2007-08 were dismissed by the ITAT. The addition made by the AO on account of capital gain was deleted by the CIT(A) as the land was considered stock-in-trade, resulting in the profit being taxed as business income. Additionally, the ITAT allowed the deduction for security charges as business expenditure for the assessment year 2007-08.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 17:31:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1716 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198644</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2003-04, 2006-07, and 2007-08 were dismissed by the ITAT. The addition made by the AO on account of capital gain was deleted by the CIT(A) as the land was considered stock-in-trade, resulting in the profit being taxed as business income. Additionally, the ITAT allowed the deduction for security charges as business expenditure for the assessment year 2007-08.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>