https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198640 Documents seized during investigation as muddamal articles do not automatically fall within the copy-supply scheme under Section 173(5)(a) and Section 173(7) of the Code. The prosecution must first propose to rely on the documents as documentary evidence; only then are they documents forwarded with the police report and subject to copies for the accused. Section 207 similarly extends only to the police report and the documents forwarded with it, not to every seized article that merely takes documentary form. On the stated facts, the accused had no right to copies of the seized items. en-us Fri, 20 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Feb 2018 17:20:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198640 Documents seized during investigation as muddamal articles do not automatically fall within the copy-supply scheme under Section 173(5)(a) and Section 173(7) of the Code. The prosecution must first propose to rely on the documents as documentary evidence; only then are they documents forwarded with the police report and subject to copies for the accused. Section 207 similarly extends only to the police report and the documents forwarded with it, not to every seized article that merely takes documentary form. On the stated facts, the accused had no right to copies of the seized items. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198640