https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198635 Negligent blood screening and transfusion in a public hospital is presented as a violation of the right to life and health, attracting public law compensation where improper HIV testing causes serious injury. The commentary also states that sovereign immunity cannot defeat constitutional redress in such cases, and that the hospital employer was directed to pay compensation. It further notes broader directions for AIDS control, including safer blood transfusion practices, blood bank monitoring, biomedical waste disposal, rehabilitation, awareness, counselling, training of medical personnel, and special treatment facilities to strengthen public health safeguards. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Feb 2018 15:10:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198635 Negligent blood screening and transfusion in a public hospital is presented as a violation of the right to life and health, attracting public law compensation where improper HIV testing causes serious injury. The commentary also states that sovereign immunity cannot defeat constitutional redress in such cases, and that the hospital employer was directed to pay compensation. It further notes broader directions for AIDS control, including safer blood transfusion practices, blood bank monitoring, biomedical waste disposal, rehabilitation, awareness, counselling, training of medical personnel, and special treatment facilities to strengthen public health safeguards. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198635