<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 1018 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198631</link>
    <description>A statutory housing board may dispose of land only within the limits of its parent Act and Rules, namely where the land vests in the Board and falls within a sanctioned housing scheme. Section 22(g) does not create an independent power of sale, and government directions under Section 79(1) cannot authorise action contrary to the Act. On the facts noted, the land was outside any sanctioned scheme, so the government order and sale deed were beyond power and void. Delay, laches and lack of locus standi were also rejected because the challenge concerned ultra vires action and public injury, and no intervening third-party rights were shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 1018 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198631</link>
      <description>A statutory housing board may dispose of land only within the limits of its parent Act and Rules, namely where the land vests in the Board and falls within a sanctioned housing scheme. Section 22(g) does not create an independent power of sale, and government directions under Section 79(1) cannot authorise action contrary to the Act. On the facts noted, the land was outside any sanctioned scheme, so the government order and sale deed were beyond power and void. Delay, laches and lack of locus standi were also rejected because the challenge concerned ultra vires action and public injury, and no intervening third-party rights were shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>