<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 933 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198630</link>
    <description>The conduct of a promotion examination in a Regional Rural Bank was governed by the applicable rules, which vested the examination with the Banking Institute and not the Chairman, and the written test and merit list were prepared by the examining body. Allegations that the selection was tainted by mala fides, bias, and unfairness failed because they rested on vague pleadings, relationship-based suspicion, and unproved irregularities in custody or transmission of papers. The governing principle is that mala fides and bias must be supported by specific particulars and cogent proof, not conjecture. On the material available, no manipulation of the examination or merit list was established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 11:37:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 933 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198630</link>
      <description>The conduct of a promotion examination in a Regional Rural Bank was governed by the applicable rules, which vested the examination with the Banking Institute and not the Chairman, and the written test and merit list were prepared by the examining body. Allegations that the selection was tainted by mala fides, bias, and unfairness failed because they rested on vague pleadings, relationship-based suspicion, and unproved irregularities in custody or transmission of papers. The governing principle is that mala fides and bias must be supported by specific particulars and cogent proof, not conjecture. On the material available, no manipulation of the examination or merit list was established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>