https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198627 Where the Code provides specific remedies by appeal and review against an order dismissing a suit for want of prosecution, the court cannot invoke Section 151 inherent powers to bypass those remedies. The dismissal here stemmed from the plaintiff's failure to comply with the affidavit requirement, not from any court error, so inherent jurisdiction was unavailable. Review under Order 47, Rule 1 was also unavailable because review is confined to narrow grounds and cannot reopen a deliberate dismissal based on non-compliance and negligence. The original dismissal for want of prosecution was therefore restored and the order setting it aside was annulled. en-us Mon, 05 Aug 1946 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Feb 2018 11:03:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198627 Where the Code provides specific remedies by appeal and review against an order dismissing a suit for want of prosecution, the court cannot invoke Section 151 inherent powers to bypass those remedies. The dismissal here stemmed from the plaintiff's failure to comply with the affidavit requirement, not from any court error, so inherent jurisdiction was unavailable. Review under Order 47, Rule 1 was also unavailable because review is confined to narrow grounds and cannot reopen a deliberate dismissal based on non-compliance and negligence. The original dismissal for want of prosecution was therefore restored and the order setting it aside was annulled. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Aug 1946 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198627