https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198621 The Court directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representations for refund and interest within three months from the date of receipt of the order copy, if not already done so. The petitioner's appeal against the rejection order was found to be within the period of limitation, and the delay in considering the representations was deemed unjustifiable. The Court did not express an opinion on the case's merits but emphasized the need for the second respondent to address the petitioner's claims promptly and in compliance with the law. en-us Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Feb 2018 10:40:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198621 The Court directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representations for refund and interest within three months from the date of receipt of the order copy, if not already done so. The petitioner's appeal against the rejection order was found to be within the period of limitation, and the delay in considering the representations was deemed unjustifiable. The Court did not express an opinion on the case's merits but emphasized the need for the second respondent to address the petitioner's claims promptly and in compliance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198621