https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198620 The execution court could cancel an earlier delivery recorded in execution proceedings when the delivery record was alleged to be false and no real delivery had occurred. Its inherent power under Section 151 CPC extends to orders necessary to secure the ends of justice, prevent abuse of process, and set aside an order obtained by fraud. The cancellation order was held to bind the sub-tarwad represented in those proceedings, leaving no basis to treat it as ineffective against the person objecting to the later delivery. After valid cancellation of the first delivery, the court was competent to order a second delivery of the same properties. en-us Thu, 24 Feb 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Feb 2018 10:34:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198620 The execution court could cancel an earlier delivery recorded in execution proceedings when the delivery record was alleged to be false and no real delivery had occurred. Its inherent power under Section 151 CPC extends to orders necessary to secure the ends of justice, prevent abuse of process, and set aside an order obtained by fraud. The cancellation order was held to bind the sub-tarwad represented in those proceedings, leaving no basis to treat it as ineffective against the person objecting to the later delivery. After valid cancellation of the first delivery, the court was competent to order a second delivery of the same properties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Feb 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198620