<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 307 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354886</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned proceedings. It concluded that the reopening of the assessment was contrary to law, based on a change of opinion, and influenced by audit objections rather than new tangible material. The court emphasized that the assessing officer&#039;s decision in the original assessment was justified and supported by relevant judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=507753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 307 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354886</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned proceedings. It concluded that the reopening of the assessment was contrary to law, based on a change of opinion, and influenced by audit objections rather than new tangible material. The court emphasized that the assessing officer&#039;s decision in the original assessment was justified and supported by relevant judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>